Author Topic: Strategus 2.0 History  (Read 23175 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Slantedfloors

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 134
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: LLJK
  • Game nicks: LLJK_Slanted
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #75 on: September 14, 2011, 10:54:08 PM »
0
What needs to happen is that some people need to step down from their high(Plated chargers) horses and shake eachothers hands. Honestly, like maybe invite eachother for karoake on the Teamspeak or somethin'. Just to get to know eachother alittle more and clear some misunderstandings. Both sides are clearly up for some fun.
Conspiring and organizing an effort to wipe out a faction at the beginning of the game for no real reason sort of poisons the well.

Offline Dehitay

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 121
  • Infamy: 48
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #76 on: September 15, 2011, 01:45:29 AM »
0
Conspiring and organizing an effort to wipe out a faction at the beginning of the game for no real reason sort of poisons the well.
aka somebody sucks at singing

Offline PhantomZero

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 384
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
  • I'm going to need you playing at 6AM on Saturday..
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BIRD CLAN
  • Game nicks: POSTMASTER_PHANTOM0_OF_BIRD
  • IRC nick: PhantomZero
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #77 on: September 15, 2011, 04:24:43 AM »
0
What needs to happen is that some people need to step down from their high(Plated chargers) horses and shake eachothers hands. Honestly, like maybe invite eachother for karoake on the Teamspeak or somethin'. Just to get to know eachother alittle more and clear some misunderstandings. Both sides are clearly up for some fun.

This is what happened last time, we had no problems with Shogunate setting up next door to us until they started plotting to take us out. To us it seemed as though you guys just hate us for enjoying the game. You guys didn't wipe us from Strategus 1 either, you knocked us around a bit because we only had 3 villages and were in the middle of sieging a castle when your 10 villages decided to attack. But in the end we occupied half the desert.

But at this point we probably won't trust you guys as long as Ujin is in a position of power.  But it is just as important that we are on opposite sides of the map. :D

We sort of like this rivalry now and you shouldn't take insults or whatever on the forums personally or seriously.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline HarunYahya

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 966
  • Infamy: 309
  • cRPG Player
  • Proud Abdulla wielder
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: HarunYahya,HarunShootya,Inan
  • IRC nick: HarunYahya
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #78 on: September 15, 2011, 08:37:54 AM »
0
We BashiBazouks had 6 fiefs not 5.
Fedner,Chaeza,Emer,Sarimish,Saren,Almerra Castle.
History of Strategus v2 by BashiBazouk point of view.
(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: September 15, 2011, 10:34:11 AM by koyama »

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1326
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #79 on: September 15, 2011, 08:58:52 AM »
0
They supported FCC against Merceneries

That's not really accurate. They were in the Dhirim/Reyvadin area and were looking out for their own interests and trying to side with whoever they thought was winning. That explains why they attacked Ayyike right after TKoV took it in a really hard fight against Wolves (abays lost that fight really badly as it was the first fight with the new spawn system.. and it was extra bugged in that anyone with a negative KDR could not spawn.. so took their spawn easy).
Later when HRE sent an army against the Mercs, the abays decided to attempt to take a village from Mercs as they thought things had turned against the mercs.

Offline HarunYahya

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 966
  • Infamy: 309
  • cRPG Player
  • Proud Abdulla wielder
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: HarunYahya,HarunShootya,Inan
  • IRC nick: HarunYahya
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #80 on: September 15, 2011, 09:08:41 AM »
0
Well "Enemy of my enemy is my friend." They fought against Mercs which means they supported enemies of Mercs, and their main enemy was FCC by that time amirite ?

Offline Classical

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 133
  • Infamy: 62
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #81 on: September 15, 2011, 09:19:47 AM »
0
I always wanted to know what the Wolves history was, and now I know!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1326
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #82 on: September 15, 2011, 09:29:25 AM »
0
Well "Enemy of my enemy is my friend." They fought against Mercs which means they supported enemies of Mercs, and their main enemy was FCC by that time amirite ?

well, the quote is true.. but i dont know if it applies to abays or not, i dont think they cared which side won, they just hoped to get something out of helping whoever looked to be winning... i dont think they saw either side as an enemy or a friend.

Offline The_Angle

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 91
  • Infamy: 56
  • cRPG Player
  • Qaddaffi 4 eva
    • View Profile
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #83 on: September 15, 2011, 09:30:43 AM »
0
@PhantomZero

Alrighty then, well feel free to pop into the teamspeak if you like.

Perhaps the EU/NA split will spread us far apart and we may not have to deal with eachother unless somebody border crosses, for the best probably.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2011, 09:35:00 AM by The_Angle »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

In the land of rape and honey, you prey.

Offline HarunYahya

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 966
  • Infamy: 309
  • cRPG Player
  • Proud Abdulla wielder
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: HarunYahya,HarunShootya,Inan
  • IRC nick: HarunYahya
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #84 on: September 15, 2011, 09:38:44 AM »
0
well, the quote is true.. but i dont know if it applies to abays or not, i dont think they cared which side won, they just hoped to get something out of helping whoever looked to be winning... i dont think they saw either side as an enemy or a friend.
Oh so FCC wasn't in a friendly diplomatic relations with Royal Union ?
I just wrote what i know/understand from far west corner of the map =)
Correct me if i posted something wrong so i can change .
« Last Edit: September 15, 2011, 09:42:57 AM by koyama »

Offline Tears of Destiny

  • Naive
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1844
  • Infamy: 870
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Quiet drifting through shallow waters. 死のび
    • View Profile
    • NADS
  • Faction: Black Company
  • IRC nick: Tears
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #85 on: September 15, 2011, 09:46:15 AM »
0
Remember to write history from your perspective! Keep it!
I'm not normal and I don't pretend so, my approach is pretty much a bomb crescendo.
Death is a fun way to pass the time though, several little bullets moving in staccato.
The terror of my reign will live on in infamy, singing when they die like a dead man's symphony.

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1326
  • Infamy: 371
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #86 on: September 15, 2011, 09:54:27 AM »
0
yeah we never had any deals with abay. he tried to make a deal with us early on and offered a bunch of gold, but due to some interesting circumstances... that fell through, then he attacked TKoV after they got Ayyike, then he offered us peace later and we were like "sure." so then he was going to attack mercs, things went badly for em, and i dont really know what all happened to them after. So, like I said... he was never really on anyone's side, he was just hoping to secure some land from the conflict.

Offline HarunYahya

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 966
  • Infamy: 309
  • cRPG Player
  • Proud Abdulla wielder
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BashiBazouks
  • Game nicks: HarunYahya,HarunShootya,Inan
  • IRC nick: HarunYahya
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #87 on: September 15, 2011, 10:34:36 AM »
0
yeah we never had any deals with abay. he tried to make a deal with us early on and offered a bunch of gold, but due to some interesting circumstances... that fell through, then he attacked TKoV after they got Ayyike, then he offered us peace later and we were like "sure." so then he was going to attack mercs, things went badly for em, and i dont really know what all happened to them after. So, like I said... he was never really on anyone's side, he was just hoping to secure some land from the conflict.
Edited.
Thanks for da info.

Offline Overdriven

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 827
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Great Khans
  • Game nicks: GK_Overdriven
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #88 on: September 15, 2011, 10:39:14 AM »
0
I would like to know why the great khans one wasn't added to the first post  :o

Offline Loki

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 228
  • Infamy: 57
  • cRPG Player
  • I don't know karate, but I know crazy.
    • View Profile
    • The Fallen Brigade
  • Faction: The Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Loki
Re: Strategus 2.0 History
« Reply #89 on: September 15, 2011, 10:52:28 AM »
+5
Factions and their territories before wipe:

UIF 2.0   _of_Grey, Druzhina_, STR_/T_/Legio_/Risen_/22nd_/_of_Chaos/RuConquista_/BIA_/BashiBazouk_   66
LLJK   LLJK_   11
Fallen Brigade   Fallen_   9
Mercs   Merc_   7
Camel Screamers   Camels_   6
Great Khans   GK_   4
HRE   _HRE   4
Caravan Guild (Guards)   Guard_   4
The Kingdom of Veluca   _TKoV   3
Wolves   Wolves_   3
FCC   _BRD/Corns_/Cavaliers_   2
Horde of Khan   XKhanx_   1
Ninjas   Ninja_   1
Roaming Wolpertingers   Wolper_   1
The Pillagers   Pillaging_   0
Byzantium   Byzamtium_   0
The Eastern Tsardom (NE)   TS_   0
ATS (NE)   _ATS   0
Kyeldurhts Hospitaller (NE)   Hospitaller_   0
Kyeldurhts of Blackrose   Blackrose_   0
Wargs (The_Bandits)   Warg_   0
Kyeldurhts Templar   Templar_   0
Schwert Bruder   SB_   0
Crusaders of Acre   _Crusader   0
The Company   Company_   0
Order of the Lance   _OotL   0
The Turks   Kapikulu_   0
Pecores   Pecores_   0
Royal Union   _of_Abay, ?,?   0
Ravens   Raven_   0
Sea Raiders   SeaRaider_   0
Varangians   VRN_   0

There ya go, I fixed it for you.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login